There has been a good deal of discussion regarding the proposed Universal Basic Income (UBI). Much of these discussions have revolved around the moral and ethical reasoning in support of a UBI. Personally I don't think any moral or ethical argument for the right to a Universal Basic Income can hold water anymore than moral or ethical arguments for the right to health care do.
This leaves us with only the pragmatic or utilitarian arguments.
Several questions strike me as needing answers in...
The primary tenant of 'Classical liberalism' as opposed to the Continental (US) version which has turned the original on its head, is that under a universal rule of law intended to protect the private recognizable property of individuals, a spontaneous societal order would emerge which could not have been produced by planning and planners.
Order can come about in one of two ways. It can either be a planned or an unplanned order.
An example of a planned order might be the laying out of a street system in a new development.
An example of an unplanned or spontaneous order might be language.
The more complex the order, the more it is likely to be the result of an unplanned spontaneity. Other examples being money, markets and law.
If we compile the work of Gramci,, Bernays and Chomsky what emerges is a clear picture of how opinions are formed and cultures shaped. The tools are human psychology and words. The most important battle we are engaged in today is one of words, ideas and opinions. The authoritarians have been busy for some time in corrupting language in order to fool and manipulate us.
Antonio Gramsci argued that propaganda is the main fabric through which contemporary power asserts itself. For Gramsci, propaganda is central to cultural hegemony; in other words, the dominance of a particular worldview (often that of the ruling class or elite) that is so deeply internalized by society that it becomes ‘common sense’ and uncritically accepted as natural and inevitable.
When a group of people have for some significant period of time been indoctrinated into believing themselves victims, it is quite easy for them to see violence against their opponents as a form of self-defense.
This is what we are witnessing playing out asymmetrically in the political arena today.
These people are able to rejoice in harm if not death for those they hate as a wife might rejoice in harm if not death for her abusive husband.
A very bad concept has seeped into a significant portion of the public's consciousness via the sewer known as academia. It is the idea that retaliation is a perfectly acceptable, permissible and justifiable way to treat people of certain groups (primarily white heterosexual males).
The concept forces a person to reason that since some people no longer living once mistreated some people also no longer living, that people from the latter group living today who were never mistreated are entitled...
Identitarian means relating to or supporting the political interests of a particular racial, ethnic, or national group.
It's essential a fancy word for tribalism.
It pits one's own group against that of every other group. A war against all as Hobbs put it.
We rarely if ever stop to appreciate the role predictability plays in our lives.
To cite one simple example consider automobile traffic. Try to imagine the number of predictable behaviors that are involved in a simple drive to the grocery store, let alone a cross-country trip.
I have always considered it remarkable how few automobile accidents there are when one considers the number of miles logged each and every year.
It has been said that it's not who gets to vote that matters but who gets to count the votes.
Likewise, it is not who gets to craft the laws or even the laws themselves that matter but who gets to interpret them.
That is certainly evident today as we are witnessing judicial activism on a grand scale.
I suppose everyone appreciates the importance of consistency. However, there is more than one variety of consistency. The one admonishes us to be true and consistent with regard to principle, while the other cautions us to change course when new evidence suggests we should.
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen, philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the...
Abstractions are what enable us to think more economically. They reduce innumerable things into one simple term.
We are abstracting when we consider some category of existents and consider only the elements common to all members of the category eliminating from our consideration all measurements.
For example the term table is an abstraction.
Included in the abstraction 'table' are the elements all tables have in common.
They are: A flat surface and some means of support.
The measurements left out...
The concept of the social sciences came into being in the 17th century.
The term is misleading since there really can be no such thing. That is not to say that we cannot study social arrangements or societies. It is to say that such studies do not qualify as science. They are actually closer to history or anthropology.
When once we have convinced ourselves that studying social arrangements and societies can be treated as scientific investigation, then it is a very small leap to concluding that...
Jesus is purported to have advised his listeners: 'Judge not lest you yourself be judged.'
For as long as I can remember I have found this admonition to be unsatisfactory.
I find the advice of Ayn Rand far more compelling. 'Judge and prepare to be judged.'
When one group or another is found engaging in some type of inappropriate behavior, one of their initial responses to save face will be be to claim that their opponents engage in precisely the same type of behavior. They are attempting to prove equivalence.
This is what the term 'Whataboutism' is calling attention to.
In our current political environment one side of the spectrum is asymmetrically far more responsible for violent rhetoric and violence itself.
Cultures have always clashed and evolved.
However, I think we are in a period of cultural upheaval which is unprecedented by most measures.
I don't believe there has ever been a period in human history where such a massive assault was waged against a civilization and its culture. The assault I am referring to is that against western civilization and the culture it represents.
Never have so many been induced to hate their own civilizational history and culture. A sort of self-loathing has spread...
The terms left wing and right wing originated in the French National Assembly in 1789.
On the right side of the chamber sat the Conservatives who supported the monarchy, the established church, and the existing hierarchy.
On the left side of the assembly sat the Radicals who were in favor of a revolution and serious reforms.
When the terms leapt across the pond to America the right wing was the Conservatives and Republicans.
The left wing was the Liberals and Democrats.
I don't believe these...
When one takes an account of all the successful developments in social systems, they realize that not a one of them was planned or designed by any person or group of persons. Instead, they came to exist spontaneously without guide or guidance. It was simply the result of millions of people acting independently of one another, in their own self-interest and without understanding the implications of their actions.
I am thinking of such developments as language, markets, money, and law.
On the...
“It is no excuse for presumptuous ignorance that it is directed by insolent passion.”
Edmund Burke
Unfortunately people often confuse zeal with insight. It is both fascinating and disturbing to observe how frequently ignorance and passion are to be found in the same person.
Apathy regarding one's society may not be a criminal offense but it certainly is not something to laud or be proud of either.
A long time ago I had a custom license plate which read 'I CARE'. When I went to the DMV to pick it up, the young woman there asked me what it meant. I asked her, have you ever heard someone say 'Who cares?'. Sure she said. Well, I care I told her.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
Edmund Burke